KUALA LUMPUR, 4 Julai (Hrkh) - Angkatan Muda Keadilan (AMK) Selangor akan membuat laporan polis terhadap Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak jam 2.30 petang ini di Balai Polis Daerah Shah Alam, berdasarkan pendedahan Akuan Bersumpah P.Balasubramaniam kelmarin.
Menurut kenyataan ringkas AMK kepada Harakahdaily, laporan polis ini dibuat serentak diseluruh negara oleh semua AMK negeri Selangor bertujuan untuk mendesak pihak polis agar segera menyiasat pembabitan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib berdasarkan Akuan Bersumpah tersebut.
Semalam, penyiasat persendirian Abdul Razak Baginda, Balasubramaniam Perumal telah membuat pendedahan mengejutkan melalui satu surat akuan bersumpah berkaitan hubungan di antara Timbalan Perdana Menteri Dato' Seri Najib dan Altantuya Sharibuu.
Surat Akuan bersumpah yang dibuat pada 1 Julai lalu di hadapan Pesuruhjaya Sumpah di Jalan Tun Razak, Kuala Lumpur itu turut menyatakan secara terperinci perbincangan di antara Bala dengan Razak tentang Altantuya dan hubungannya dengan Najib sebelum terjadinya pembunuhan pada malam itu.
Pendedahan itu dibuat dalam sidang media bersama Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, di ibu pejabat KeADILan, Petaling Jaya dan hadir sama dalam sidang media itu pemimpin KeADILan, Tian Chua, Sivarasah, Saifuddin Nasition, Azmin Ali serta kelihatan bersama-sama pihak media ialah Raja Petra Kamaruddin.
Bagaimanapun, lapor Bernama, penyiasat persendirian P. Balasubramaniam yang semalam menuduh Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak mempunyai hubungan dengan wanita Mongolia Altantuya Shaariibuu dalam akuan bersumpahnya bertarikh 1 Julai, hari ini menarik balik tuduhan itu.
Semua tuduhan dalam akuan bersumpah itu adalah tidak tepat dan tidak benar, kata Balasubramaniam menerusi peguamnya M. Arulampalam pada sidang akhbar di sini.
Sumber: HarakahDaily.net
http://www.harakahdaily.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15572&Itemid=1
Friday, July 4, 2008
Terkini! Bala Tarik Balik Akuan Berkanun
Penyiasat persendirian, P Balasubramaniam membuat kejutan lagi apabila menarik balik akuan berkanunnya yang mengaitkan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak dengan Altantuya Shaariibuu.
Dalam akuan berkanunnya itu, Balasubramaniam mendakwa Najib mempunya hubungan seksual dengan Altantuya. Najib juga didakwa memperkenalkan Altantuya kepada Abdul Razak Baginda.Balasubramaniam berkata, beliau telah dipaksa membuat akuan berkanun tersebut. Dalam satu sidang akhbar di sebuah hotel di Kuala Lulmpu pagi ini, Balasubramaniam membuat akuan berkanun yang baru.
Akuan berkanun yang baru itu tanpa rujukan Najib mempunyai hubungan seksual dengan Altantuya ataupun Najib yang memperkenalkan Abdul Razak baginda kepada wanita Mongolia tersebut.
Balasubramaniam juga mempunyai peguam yang baru. Peguam Americk Sidhu, yang bersamanya semalam, juga tidak tahu apa yang sedang berlaku. Sidang akhbar Balasubramaniam masih berjalan.
Semalam, Balasubramaniam membuat pendedahan yang menggemparkan bahawa beliau telah mendengar dari Abdul Razak mengenai hubungan Najib dengan Altantuya.Tetapi hari ini beliau berkata, beliau mahu menarik balik akuan berkanunnya pertama, yang difailnya pada 1 Julai, dan menggantikannya dengan yang baru, yang diumumkannya hari ini.
"Saya mahu menarik balik akuan berkanun yang pertama," katanya sambil menambah, beliau dipaksa membuat akuan berkanun tersebut.
Balasubramaniam telah diupah oleh Abdul Razak untuk menguruskan Altantuya pada 2006 yang mengganggu Abdul Razak, yang juga rapat dengan Najib.
Sumber: Malaysiakini
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/85556
Dalam akuan berkanunnya itu, Balasubramaniam mendakwa Najib mempunya hubungan seksual dengan Altantuya. Najib juga didakwa memperkenalkan Altantuya kepada Abdul Razak Baginda.Balasubramaniam berkata, beliau telah dipaksa membuat akuan berkanun tersebut. Dalam satu sidang akhbar di sebuah hotel di Kuala Lulmpu pagi ini, Balasubramaniam membuat akuan berkanun yang baru.
Akuan berkanun yang baru itu tanpa rujukan Najib mempunyai hubungan seksual dengan Altantuya ataupun Najib yang memperkenalkan Abdul Razak baginda kepada wanita Mongolia tersebut.
Balasubramaniam juga mempunyai peguam yang baru. Peguam Americk Sidhu, yang bersamanya semalam, juga tidak tahu apa yang sedang berlaku. Sidang akhbar Balasubramaniam masih berjalan.
Semalam, Balasubramaniam membuat pendedahan yang menggemparkan bahawa beliau telah mendengar dari Abdul Razak mengenai hubungan Najib dengan Altantuya.Tetapi hari ini beliau berkata, beliau mahu menarik balik akuan berkanunnya pertama, yang difailnya pada 1 Julai, dan menggantikannya dengan yang baru, yang diumumkannya hari ini.
"Saya mahu menarik balik akuan berkanun yang pertama," katanya sambil menambah, beliau dipaksa membuat akuan berkanun tersebut.
Balasubramaniam telah diupah oleh Abdul Razak untuk menguruskan Altantuya pada 2006 yang mengganggu Abdul Razak, yang juga rapat dengan Najib.
Sumber: Malaysiakini
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/85556
Terkini! Perhimpunan berpindah ke Stadium Kelana Jaya
Perhimpunan aman Protes Sejuta Rakyat Ahad ini yang dijadual diadakan di Padang Timur, Petaling Jaya telah ditukar ke Stadium Kelana Jaya.
Perkara itu disahkan oleh Ketua Angkatan Muka PKR (AMK), Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin.
Menurut Shamsul, perubahan tempat ini diputuskan dalam mesyuarat Pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat semalam.
Difahamkan mesyuarat tersebut diadakan di rumah ketua umum PKR Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim di Bukit Segambut.
Stadium Kelana Jaya boleh memuatkan 50,000 tempat duduk. Manakala padangnya pula boleh memuatkan jumlah hadirin yang sama.
Penyelaras Protes Dr. Hatta Ramli ketika dihubungi mengesahkan pertukaran tempat itu tetapi belum mahu menjelaskan butiran lanjut perkara itu.
Semalam, Ketua polis Selangor, Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar menasihatkan orang ramai supaya tidak menyertai perhimpunan tersebut.
Katanya, beliau telah menasihatkan menteri besar Selangor Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim supaya tidak membenarkan perhimpunan itu diadakan.Menurutnya lagi, jika masih ingin meneruskannya, ia boleh dipindahkan ke lokasi lebih sesuai seperti Stadium Shah Alam atau Stadium Malawati, juga di Shah Alam.
Sumber: Malaysiakini
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/85555
Admin: Maklumat lanjut akan dikemasikini secepat mungkin.
Perkara itu disahkan oleh Ketua Angkatan Muka PKR (AMK), Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin.
Menurut Shamsul, perubahan tempat ini diputuskan dalam mesyuarat Pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat semalam.
Difahamkan mesyuarat tersebut diadakan di rumah ketua umum PKR Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim di Bukit Segambut.
Stadium Kelana Jaya boleh memuatkan 50,000 tempat duduk. Manakala padangnya pula boleh memuatkan jumlah hadirin yang sama.
Penyelaras Protes Dr. Hatta Ramli ketika dihubungi mengesahkan pertukaran tempat itu tetapi belum mahu menjelaskan butiran lanjut perkara itu.
Semalam, Ketua polis Selangor, Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar menasihatkan orang ramai supaya tidak menyertai perhimpunan tersebut.
Katanya, beliau telah menasihatkan menteri besar Selangor Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim supaya tidak membenarkan perhimpunan itu diadakan.Menurutnya lagi, jika masih ingin meneruskannya, ia boleh dipindahkan ke lokasi lebih sesuai seperti Stadium Shah Alam atau Stadium Malawati, juga di Shah Alam.
Sumber: Malaysiakini
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/85555
Admin: Maklumat lanjut akan dikemasikini secepat mungkin.
Sekitar Kenyataan Media AMK Melaka Dan PR Melaka
AMK Melaka khasnya telah sekali lagi mendapat liputan media. Liputan yang telah disiarkan pada 1 Julai 2008 di akhbar Sinar Harian telah menunjukkan sikap pro aktif AMK Melaka dalam menyatakan ketegasan dalam isu tuduhan tidak berasas terhadap Ketua Umum Parti Keadilan Rakyat Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Kenyataan tersebut telah dibuat oleh Sdr. Hairiz Nordin (Timb. Ketua AMK Melaka) di Pejabat Keadilan, Malim. Turut serta Sdr. Ong Teck Chuan (Ketua Penerangan AMK Melaka) di samping Sdr. Lokman, Sdr. Zamzizul dan beberapa ahli AMK Melaka yang lain. Kenyataan media ini adalah sebagai tanda sokongan dan pendirian AMK Melaka yang sentiasa berdiri teguh di belakang Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Dalam sidang media tersebut Sdr. Hairiz Nordin juga telah menunjukkan sekeping gambar petuduh Saiful Bukhari Azlan di samping beberapa Menteri dan kakitangan atasan kerajaan. Gambar tersebut telah menunjukkan pertuduhan yang dibuat Saiful Bukhari Azlan boleh diragui dan mempunyai konspirasi jahat terhadap Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.
Dalam masa yang sama akhbar Sinar Harian juga telah memuatkan kenyataan media Pakatan Rakyat yang menyatakan akan berdiri teguh di belakang Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Naib Ketua Parti Keadilan Rakyat Bhgn. Jasin, Sdr. Manan Ismail telah mengutuk sekeras-kerasnya terhadap tuduhan tidak berasas tersebut. Sdr. Manan Ismail menyifatkan tuduhan tersebut adalah bermotif jahat. Sdr. Zamzizul (Ketua AMK Bhgn jasin) juga telah mengutuk sekeras-kerasnya terhadap kenyataan tersebut dan yakin isu tersebut sengaja diadakan. Sidang akhbar yang diadakan turut disertai Pengerusi DAP Caw. Jasin, Sdr. Ramu Krisnan Kutty, Pengasas Hindraf Jasin, Sdr. K Krishnan, Ketua Wanita PKR Melaka, Pn. Mahani Misban dan beberapa ahli jawatankuasa PKR Caw. jasin.
Admin
Sumber (Gambar): http://amk-jasin.blogspot.com
Thursday, July 3, 2008
Press Statement and Statutory Declaration on Relationship between Najib and Altantuya
From the Office of Anwar Ibrahim: Press Statement - for immediate release
3 July 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
Today we witness another episode of a consistent pattern of abuse of power and manipulation of the criminal justice system.Recently one of the witnesses in the Altantuya trial approached us with detailed information of events connected to her disappearance and murder. The information was shocking.
Mr. P. Balasubramaniam, who was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda as a private investigator was advised to seek legal counsel and document his story independently.
Today he is releasing a statutory declaration dated 1st July 2008 to the public detailing the story that he has to tell about what actually happened and what was told to him by key personalities in this saga including Abdul Razak Baginda and Altantuya herself.These revelations speak for themselves. They reveal, amongst others, the following allegations:
1.Mr. Balasubramaniam was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda to deal with alleged harassment by Altantuya in relation to debts owed to her (Paragraph 5 and 6).
2.Altantuya was promised a commission of USD 500,000 for assisting in a submarine deal in Paris (Paragraph 22, Paragraph 25.5 and Paragraph 28.2 and 28.3 ).
3.Altantuya was introduced to Razak Baginda by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore ( Paragraph 25.5 and Paragraph 28.1).
4.Altantuya, Datuk Seri Najib and Razak Baginda had all been seen together at a dinner in Paris (Paragraph 28.2).
5.After the disappearance of Altantuya, a commotion took place in front of Razak Baginda’s house several days after 20 December 2006 where girl friends of Altantuya and one Mr.Ang (Altantuya’s own private investigator) arrived searching for Altantuya. Balasubramaniam had to call the police. A patrol car arrived shortly. Shortly thereafter an investigating officer from Dang Wangi Police Station who was handling the missing persons report lodged by one of Altantuya’s girl friends arrived. Balasubramaniam then informed Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. Razak then called one DSP Musa Safri who called him back informing him that Musa would be calling him on his handphone and that he was to pass the phone to the inspector from Dang Wangi Police station. Balasubramaniam then received the call from Musa Safri and duly passed the phone to the inspector. After the conversation of 3 - 4 minutes, the inspector told the girls to disperse and to see him the next day (Paragraphs 34 - 38). We believe DSP Musa Safri was aide-de-camp to Datuk Seri Najib at the material time.
6.Balasubramaniam was interrogated at Bukit Aman for seven consecutive days and his statement recorded at the end of November 2006. He says that he told the police all that he knew including everything Razak Baginda and Altantuya had told him about their relationships with Najib. These details were omitted from the statement he was asked to sign (Paragraph 49).
7.During the trial of Sirul, Azilah and Razak Baginda at at the Shah Alam High Court, the prosecutor did not ask him any questions in respect of the relationship Altantuya had with Datuk Seri Najib or of the phone call that he had received form DSP Musa Safri (Paragraph 50).
8.When Razak Baginda was arrested, Balasubramaniam was told by him that he had sent an SMS messsage to Najib the evening before (Paragraph 51). Razak also informed Balasubramaniam that he had received an SMS from Najib and showed it to him; the message read “I am seeing IGP at 11 A.M. today …. matter will be solved … be cool”.Mr. Balasubramaniam’s evidence also mentions the extent of the relationship between Altantuya and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. We are not interested in the personal nature of the relationship. That is entirely his own business and hers.
However the allegations revealed by him raise key questions of public interest:
a)Suppression of evidence by the police investigating officers and those responsible for prosecuting this case. Such suppression could only have happened with the full knowledge of top public officials such as the IGP and the AG.
b)The question is also raised as to whether such suppression of evidence was the reason behind the last minute switch in DPP’s handling the case - where the head of the Criminal Division of the AG’s Chambers, Datuk Yusuf Zainal Abiden was completely sidelined from the case leading him and the senior DPP originally slotted for the case Sallehudin Saidin to put in papers for early retirement some months later.
c)Questions can be raised now with regard to the sudden switching of the judge fixed to hear the case which took place in March 2007 - why was this really done?
d) Did Datuk Seri Najib lie when he said that he had never met Altantuya before?
e) Did Datuk Seri Najib lie when he said that he was not involved in any commission deals for the purchases of the Scorpene submarines”
Mr.Balasubramaniam’s evidence vindicate what we have been saying all along; there has been no proper investigation of the murder of Altantuya and the investigation and proceedings in court seem to following a pre-arranged script for a pre-arranged outcome.
This has serious implications for the administration of justice in the country where the integrity and credibility of our key institutions such as the police, the AG’s chambers and the judiciary are already severely tarnished.
Today’s revelations further confirm a clear and consistent pattern of manipulation of the criminal justice system that we have witnessed in this country since 1998.
The allegations revealed here warrant a full Royal Commission of Inquiry.
ANWAR IBRAHIM
— Statutory Declaration by Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal —
STATUTORY DECLARATION
I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal (NRIC NO: xxxxxx-xx-6235) a Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at xxxxx, Selangor do solemly and sincerely declare as follows :-
1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having jointed as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance Corporal and finally resigned from the Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.
2. I have been working as a free lance Private Investigator since I left the Police Force.
3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.
4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.
5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the 05-10-2006 as he had
apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.
6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.
7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.
8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.
9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.
10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in Mongolia.
11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.
12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.
13. On the 09.10.2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.
14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.
15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.
16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.
17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash ran out.
18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.
19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.
20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t so I called the police who arrived in 2 patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her away to the Brickfields police station.
21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.
22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.
23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.
24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.
25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-
25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.
25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.
25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.
25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.
26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual. I saw a yellow proton perdana taxi pass by with 3 ladies inside, one of whom was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then left.
27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “To delay her until my man comes”.
28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-
28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.
28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.
28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.
28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.
28.6That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.
28.7 That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red proton aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.
30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue proton saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The drivers window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.
31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.
32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.
33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.
34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girl friends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.
35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.
36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.
37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the Inspector from Dang Wangi Police Station.
38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 - 4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.
39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.
40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.
41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.
42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.
43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.
44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.
45. In mid November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for Criminal intimidation.
46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On the third day I was released on police bail.
47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.
48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the 19.10.2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.
49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. everyday for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.
50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.
51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.
52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- ” I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.
53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.
54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-
54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.3 Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.
54.4 Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.
54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.
55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.
SUBCRIBED and solemnly )
declared by the abovenamed )
Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal ]
this day of 2008 )Before me,
………………………………….
Commissioner for OathKuala Lumpur
Sumber: Anwar Ibrahim Blog
http://anwaribrahimblog.com/
3 July 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
Today we witness another episode of a consistent pattern of abuse of power and manipulation of the criminal justice system.Recently one of the witnesses in the Altantuya trial approached us with detailed information of events connected to her disappearance and murder. The information was shocking.
Mr. P. Balasubramaniam, who was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda as a private investigator was advised to seek legal counsel and document his story independently.
Today he is releasing a statutory declaration dated 1st July 2008 to the public detailing the story that he has to tell about what actually happened and what was told to him by key personalities in this saga including Abdul Razak Baginda and Altantuya herself.These revelations speak for themselves. They reveal, amongst others, the following allegations:
1.Mr. Balasubramaniam was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda to deal with alleged harassment by Altantuya in relation to debts owed to her (Paragraph 5 and 6).
2.Altantuya was promised a commission of USD 500,000 for assisting in a submarine deal in Paris (Paragraph 22, Paragraph 25.5 and Paragraph 28.2 and 28.3 ).
3.Altantuya was introduced to Razak Baginda by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore ( Paragraph 25.5 and Paragraph 28.1).
4.Altantuya, Datuk Seri Najib and Razak Baginda had all been seen together at a dinner in Paris (Paragraph 28.2).
5.After the disappearance of Altantuya, a commotion took place in front of Razak Baginda’s house several days after 20 December 2006 where girl friends of Altantuya and one Mr.Ang (Altantuya’s own private investigator) arrived searching for Altantuya. Balasubramaniam had to call the police. A patrol car arrived shortly. Shortly thereafter an investigating officer from Dang Wangi Police Station who was handling the missing persons report lodged by one of Altantuya’s girl friends arrived. Balasubramaniam then informed Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. Razak then called one DSP Musa Safri who called him back informing him that Musa would be calling him on his handphone and that he was to pass the phone to the inspector from Dang Wangi Police station. Balasubramaniam then received the call from Musa Safri and duly passed the phone to the inspector. After the conversation of 3 - 4 minutes, the inspector told the girls to disperse and to see him the next day (Paragraphs 34 - 38). We believe DSP Musa Safri was aide-de-camp to Datuk Seri Najib at the material time.
6.Balasubramaniam was interrogated at Bukit Aman for seven consecutive days and his statement recorded at the end of November 2006. He says that he told the police all that he knew including everything Razak Baginda and Altantuya had told him about their relationships with Najib. These details were omitted from the statement he was asked to sign (Paragraph 49).
7.During the trial of Sirul, Azilah and Razak Baginda at at the Shah Alam High Court, the prosecutor did not ask him any questions in respect of the relationship Altantuya had with Datuk Seri Najib or of the phone call that he had received form DSP Musa Safri (Paragraph 50).
8.When Razak Baginda was arrested, Balasubramaniam was told by him that he had sent an SMS messsage to Najib the evening before (Paragraph 51). Razak also informed Balasubramaniam that he had received an SMS from Najib and showed it to him; the message read “I am seeing IGP at 11 A.M. today …. matter will be solved … be cool”.Mr. Balasubramaniam’s evidence also mentions the extent of the relationship between Altantuya and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. We are not interested in the personal nature of the relationship. That is entirely his own business and hers.
However the allegations revealed by him raise key questions of public interest:
a)Suppression of evidence by the police investigating officers and those responsible for prosecuting this case. Such suppression could only have happened with the full knowledge of top public officials such as the IGP and the AG.
b)The question is also raised as to whether such suppression of evidence was the reason behind the last minute switch in DPP’s handling the case - where the head of the Criminal Division of the AG’s Chambers, Datuk Yusuf Zainal Abiden was completely sidelined from the case leading him and the senior DPP originally slotted for the case Sallehudin Saidin to put in papers for early retirement some months later.
c)Questions can be raised now with regard to the sudden switching of the judge fixed to hear the case which took place in March 2007 - why was this really done?
d) Did Datuk Seri Najib lie when he said that he had never met Altantuya before?
e) Did Datuk Seri Najib lie when he said that he was not involved in any commission deals for the purchases of the Scorpene submarines”
Mr.Balasubramaniam’s evidence vindicate what we have been saying all along; there has been no proper investigation of the murder of Altantuya and the investigation and proceedings in court seem to following a pre-arranged script for a pre-arranged outcome.
This has serious implications for the administration of justice in the country where the integrity and credibility of our key institutions such as the police, the AG’s chambers and the judiciary are already severely tarnished.
Today’s revelations further confirm a clear and consistent pattern of manipulation of the criminal justice system that we have witnessed in this country since 1998.
The allegations revealed here warrant a full Royal Commission of Inquiry.
ANWAR IBRAHIM
— Statutory Declaration by Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal —
STATUTORY DECLARATION
I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal (NRIC NO: xxxxxx-xx-6235) a Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at xxxxx, Selangor do solemly and sincerely declare as follows :-
1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having jointed as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance Corporal and finally resigned from the Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.
2. I have been working as a free lance Private Investigator since I left the Police Force.
3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.
4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.
5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the 05-10-2006 as he had
apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.
6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.
7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.
8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.
9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.
10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in Mongolia.
11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.
12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.
13. On the 09.10.2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.
14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.
15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.
16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.
17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash ran out.
18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.
19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.
20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t so I called the police who arrived in 2 patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her away to the Brickfields police station.
21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.
22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.
23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.
24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.
25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-
25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.
25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.
25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.
25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.
26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual. I saw a yellow proton perdana taxi pass by with 3 ladies inside, one of whom was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then left.
27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “To delay her until my man comes”.
28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-
28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.
28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.
28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.
28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.
28.6That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.
28.7 That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red proton aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.
30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue proton saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The drivers window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.
31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.
32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.
33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.
34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girl friends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.
35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.
36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.
37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the Inspector from Dang Wangi Police Station.
38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 - 4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.
39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.
40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.
41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.
42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.
43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.
44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.
45. In mid November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for Criminal intimidation.
46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On the third day I was released on police bail.
47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.
48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the 19.10.2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.
49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. everyday for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.
50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.
51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.
52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- ” I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.
53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.
54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-
54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.3 Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.
54.4 Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.
54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.
55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.
SUBCRIBED and solemnly )
declared by the abovenamed )
Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal ]
this day of 2008 )Before me,
………………………………….
Commissioner for OathKuala Lumpur
Sumber: Anwar Ibrahim Blog
http://anwaribrahimblog.com/
More Rumors On Anwar Saga
Learning from the first Reformasi days, rumors are more reliable than printed information. Below are more rumors I picked up from messages provided to me and from mingling and interactions with my acquaintances and sources.
1.0 UMNO people more than convinced that the police have found traces of Anwar’s sperm in Saiful Bukhari’s “anus”. They say, the evidence that the police have on Anwar will put this story to rest for ever. And they also believe, with this evidence, the UMNO people in KeAdilan will come back to UMNO in masses.
2.0 The police, apparently, working overtime to make this case stick to Anwar for good. If it doesn’t than their already tarnished image will nose-dive to a level that no one would dare to imagine.
3.0 The police will use just about any means to convict Anwar including forging the forensic report. The forensic report will say that Anwar’s sperm is contained in Saiful Bukhari’s anus. Musa Hassan and Gani Patail will be rewarded handsomely this time around, more than what they made the last time they frame Anwar Ibrahim.
4.0 More UMNO leaders are disgusted by the latest maneuver. They are reporting already they’ve seen major rumblings within their ranks at the grassroot level. Even UMNO grassroots are not happy with this move.
5.0 Ezam Mat Nor cannot hide his true colors anymore. The day the story broke out, he was sending SMS to everyone he knows, denying his involvement in this saga. The SMS he sent goes something like this:
“demi allah, wallahi. saya tidak terlibat dalam kes terbaru membabitkan dsai. haramlah segala amal saya sekiranya saya rancang hal ini. dan saya tanya pm pun dia bersumpah dia tak teribat. logiknya pun siapa nak buat konspirasi hal yang sama dua kali? sepatutnya dsai, dswa, azmin muhasabah drpd tuduh orang laindan wallahi saya tinggalkan dsai setahun selepas dia bebas bukan kerana umno/pangkat/harta seperti yg dituduh sekrang tetapi kerana saya tidak mahu subahat/kompromi dlm perkara2 ini yg jelas bercanggah dgn prinsip islam. kpd kawan2 pejuang islam dan reformasi carilah kebenaran. ezam m nor”
(Don’t know if this is sent out by people who claims to be Ezam though, but my contact says the number he got it from is Ezam’s.)
6.0 But, yesterday, he says that he is not “surprise” by what is reported. Apparently, he is putting up a theatrical(malays call it berdrama). It seems it has been Ezam's plan even before Ezam joined UMNO (read the part on Zahid Mat Arip below). Ezam is lying when he sent out the message above anyways, because he was the one who brought Saiful to see Najib. It shows that Ezam has been involved in this charade from day one.
7.0 Anwar has been seeing so many UMNO MPs and UMNO leaders and BN leaders in secret since 2008 elections. All the meetings are held in secret places, preferably in well guarded apartments. So, UMNO via their moles knows of this meeting and they decided to use this fact to frame Anwar by using this fact.
8.0 I have also heard that the amount of cash offered to Saiful Bukhari to participate in this charade is HUGE. From several sources, the amount ranges from RM1m to RM 10 million. In short, for a guy who’s desperate for money, and knowing that no one in their right mind will hire a school dropout like him, he accepted the offer and planned to settle somewhere out of Malaysia after all this blows over.
9.0 Saiful has always been an UMNO and SB lackey even back during his UNITEN days. He was one of SB’s informer reporting on student activities especially student liked to PAS and KeAdilan. He was also and UMNO lackey on the UNITEN student council. In fact, Anwar knew that he’s a mold because out of no where he came and volunteered to work for KeAdilan.
10.0 The Turkish Connection is sending shivers down the UMNO’s spine. It shows that this time around Anwar can count on international pressure to help him out. And Turkey is a member of NATO and if BN screws up (which they will) Malaysia’s name will be tarnished forever.
11.0 Apparently, NATO has this rule on political asylum which Turkey can invoke. It means that should Anwar be given political asylum, his asylum will be honored by all NATO countries. This is something they inherited from back in the cold war days. This will be very bad for Malaysia especially when everybody knows how our Judiciary stinks. But I have to check on the validity of this story. In any case, it’s still a rumor.
12.0 They say that Dr. Mahathir is not involved this time around. They are angry with Dr. Mahathir too. But they adopted Dr Mahathir’s idea because they are at the point of extreme desperation.
13.0 Latest polling numbers are in after yesterday’s Anwar Rally. Those who believed the story, divided by race: Malays :6%, Chinese: 11% and Indians: 5%. The rest, either flat-out do not believe (which is the majority) or don’t know. This is what the SB has fed the UMNO leaders with. Among Malays, only UMNO die-hards believes that Anwar Ibrahim is a sodomizer. Figures considering only UMNO die hards are stupid enough to believe in such nonsense.
14.0 Judges has already been bought and deposits have been paid to these judges in the millions in preparation for the conviction of Anwar Ibrahim. These judges will make Augustine Paul looks like an angel. They are planning to go dirty 100%. My source will not expose their names because if he/she does, his/her identity will be exposed. Get ready for another round of kangaroo court in action.
15.0 Zahid MAt Arip once told a source of mine that "Keadilan will f**k u in the a**. This was 2 months ago. I never bothered to read between the lines. Ha di read it, i would have predicted the coming incident as we see today. This will only mean that the plan to reaccuse Anwar Ibrahim of sodomy was hatched a long time ago and it was not spur of the moment thing.
16.0 A friend told me that, what is NOT A RUMOR, is the resolve of UMNO to stay in power. He says that UMNO people, without UMNO and power, cannot survive one second in a competitive world. They will end up working as jaga, street sweeper, toilet cleener because no one will give them high paying jobs or even loans for business. But with UMNO and power, they can drive expensive cars, live in expensive houses, eat at expensive restaurants and have expensive holidays at expensive places.
NEVER UNDERESTIMATE UMNO's RESOLVE TO STAY IN POWER.
Tulang Besi
Sumber: Malaysia Waves
http://www.malaysiawaves.com/2008/07/more-rumors-on-anwar-saga.html
1.0 UMNO people more than convinced that the police have found traces of Anwar’s sperm in Saiful Bukhari’s “anus”. They say, the evidence that the police have on Anwar will put this story to rest for ever. And they also believe, with this evidence, the UMNO people in KeAdilan will come back to UMNO in masses.
2.0 The police, apparently, working overtime to make this case stick to Anwar for good. If it doesn’t than their already tarnished image will nose-dive to a level that no one would dare to imagine.
3.0 The police will use just about any means to convict Anwar including forging the forensic report. The forensic report will say that Anwar’s sperm is contained in Saiful Bukhari’s anus. Musa Hassan and Gani Patail will be rewarded handsomely this time around, more than what they made the last time they frame Anwar Ibrahim.
4.0 More UMNO leaders are disgusted by the latest maneuver. They are reporting already they’ve seen major rumblings within their ranks at the grassroot level. Even UMNO grassroots are not happy with this move.
5.0 Ezam Mat Nor cannot hide his true colors anymore. The day the story broke out, he was sending SMS to everyone he knows, denying his involvement in this saga. The SMS he sent goes something like this:
“demi allah, wallahi. saya tidak terlibat dalam kes terbaru membabitkan dsai. haramlah segala amal saya sekiranya saya rancang hal ini. dan saya tanya pm pun dia bersumpah dia tak teribat. logiknya pun siapa nak buat konspirasi hal yang sama dua kali? sepatutnya dsai, dswa, azmin muhasabah drpd tuduh orang laindan wallahi saya tinggalkan dsai setahun selepas dia bebas bukan kerana umno/pangkat/harta seperti yg dituduh sekrang tetapi kerana saya tidak mahu subahat/kompromi dlm perkara2 ini yg jelas bercanggah dgn prinsip islam. kpd kawan2 pejuang islam dan reformasi carilah kebenaran. ezam m nor”
(Don’t know if this is sent out by people who claims to be Ezam though, but my contact says the number he got it from is Ezam’s.)
6.0 But, yesterday, he says that he is not “surprise” by what is reported. Apparently, he is putting up a theatrical(malays call it berdrama). It seems it has been Ezam's plan even before Ezam joined UMNO (read the part on Zahid Mat Arip below). Ezam is lying when he sent out the message above anyways, because he was the one who brought Saiful to see Najib. It shows that Ezam has been involved in this charade from day one.
7.0 Anwar has been seeing so many UMNO MPs and UMNO leaders and BN leaders in secret since 2008 elections. All the meetings are held in secret places, preferably in well guarded apartments. So, UMNO via their moles knows of this meeting and they decided to use this fact to frame Anwar by using this fact.
8.0 I have also heard that the amount of cash offered to Saiful Bukhari to participate in this charade is HUGE. From several sources, the amount ranges from RM1m to RM 10 million. In short, for a guy who’s desperate for money, and knowing that no one in their right mind will hire a school dropout like him, he accepted the offer and planned to settle somewhere out of Malaysia after all this blows over.
9.0 Saiful has always been an UMNO and SB lackey even back during his UNITEN days. He was one of SB’s informer reporting on student activities especially student liked to PAS and KeAdilan. He was also and UMNO lackey on the UNITEN student council. In fact, Anwar knew that he’s a mold because out of no where he came and volunteered to work for KeAdilan.
10.0 The Turkish Connection is sending shivers down the UMNO’s spine. It shows that this time around Anwar can count on international pressure to help him out. And Turkey is a member of NATO and if BN screws up (which they will) Malaysia’s name will be tarnished forever.
11.0 Apparently, NATO has this rule on political asylum which Turkey can invoke. It means that should Anwar be given political asylum, his asylum will be honored by all NATO countries. This is something they inherited from back in the cold war days. This will be very bad for Malaysia especially when everybody knows how our Judiciary stinks. But I have to check on the validity of this story. In any case, it’s still a rumor.
12.0 They say that Dr. Mahathir is not involved this time around. They are angry with Dr. Mahathir too. But they adopted Dr Mahathir’s idea because they are at the point of extreme desperation.
13.0 Latest polling numbers are in after yesterday’s Anwar Rally. Those who believed the story, divided by race: Malays :6%, Chinese: 11% and Indians: 5%. The rest, either flat-out do not believe (which is the majority) or don’t know. This is what the SB has fed the UMNO leaders with. Among Malays, only UMNO die-hards believes that Anwar Ibrahim is a sodomizer. Figures considering only UMNO die hards are stupid enough to believe in such nonsense.
14.0 Judges has already been bought and deposits have been paid to these judges in the millions in preparation for the conviction of Anwar Ibrahim. These judges will make Augustine Paul looks like an angel. They are planning to go dirty 100%. My source will not expose their names because if he/she does, his/her identity will be exposed. Get ready for another round of kangaroo court in action.
15.0 Zahid MAt Arip once told a source of mine that "Keadilan will f**k u in the a**. This was 2 months ago. I never bothered to read between the lines. Ha di read it, i would have predicted the coming incident as we see today. This will only mean that the plan to reaccuse Anwar Ibrahim of sodomy was hatched a long time ago and it was not spur of the moment thing.
16.0 A friend told me that, what is NOT A RUMOR, is the resolve of UMNO to stay in power. He says that UMNO people, without UMNO and power, cannot survive one second in a competitive world. They will end up working as jaga, street sweeper, toilet cleener because no one will give them high paying jobs or even loans for business. But with UMNO and power, they can drive expensive cars, live in expensive houses, eat at expensive restaurants and have expensive holidays at expensive places.
NEVER UNDERESTIMATE UMNO's RESOLVE TO STAY IN POWER.
Tulang Besi
Sumber: Malaysia Waves
http://www.malaysiawaves.com/2008/07/more-rumors-on-anwar-saga.html
An Open Letter for New Straits Times(NST) – Saiful Was Not Even Registered As a
"An Open Letter for New Straits Times(NST)
Saiful was not even registered as a member of the university’s Islamic Club
I am writing in response to Regina Lee’s article (on NST) titled “Anwar accuser a 'genuine guy’“dated 2nd July 2008. The article quote a guy (Daniel) saying that Saiful Bukhari (the accuser in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy case) had been active in the university’s Islamic club. On behalf of The University Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN) Islamic Studies Society (PPI), I would like to deny the statement made by Daniel. The statement is clearly a false statement and I belief it has created a confusion among those who read it.
Saiful had never been a member of the university’s Islamic Club which is PPI and had never been actively involved in the club’s activity. I have looked through the database of the club’s members and Saiful’s name is not there. I have also asked some of the former PPI’s leader to check whether Saiful had registered before. The answer turned out to be ‘no”. Saiful had never registered as a member nor had been actively involved in the club.
This has created confusion among some people especially those who read it and those who had been in PPI. We do not want them to get false information regarding what is happening in the country. Furthermore it also affects the good name of the club by involving the club in the sodomy case.
I am not saying Saiful is not a ‘genuine guy’ or Daniel was telling lie. Perhaps there is some misunderstanding involved. However, what more important is NST’s credibility is at stake here. People will start to question the ability of such a big mass media company like NST to deliver the right and true information. Soon people will doubt the news published on NST and stop buying NST newspapers. I see this as a threat for NST and we do not want that to happen.Thus, I urged the editor of NST to make a statement correcting what has been told on the article for the benefits of both of us. Thank You for your cooperation.
Dzar-Abdullah Bin Amir
President
UNITEN Islamic Studies Society (PPI)
Sumber: Tranungkite.net
http://www.tranungkite.net/v7/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=12019
Saiful was not even registered as a member of the university’s Islamic Club
I am writing in response to Regina Lee’s article (on NST) titled “Anwar accuser a 'genuine guy’“dated 2nd July 2008. The article quote a guy (Daniel) saying that Saiful Bukhari (the accuser in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy case) had been active in the university’s Islamic club. On behalf of The University Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN) Islamic Studies Society (PPI), I would like to deny the statement made by Daniel. The statement is clearly a false statement and I belief it has created a confusion among those who read it.
Saiful had never been a member of the university’s Islamic Club which is PPI and had never been actively involved in the club’s activity. I have looked through the database of the club’s members and Saiful’s name is not there. I have also asked some of the former PPI’s leader to check whether Saiful had registered before. The answer turned out to be ‘no”. Saiful had never registered as a member nor had been actively involved in the club.
This has created confusion among some people especially those who read it and those who had been in PPI. We do not want them to get false information regarding what is happening in the country. Furthermore it also affects the good name of the club by involving the club in the sodomy case.
I am not saying Saiful is not a ‘genuine guy’ or Daniel was telling lie. Perhaps there is some misunderstanding involved. However, what more important is NST’s credibility is at stake here. People will start to question the ability of such a big mass media company like NST to deliver the right and true information. Soon people will doubt the news published on NST and stop buying NST newspapers. I see this as a threat for NST and we do not want that to happen.Thus, I urged the editor of NST to make a statement correcting what has been told on the article for the benefits of both of us. Thank You for your cooperation.
Dzar-Abdullah Bin Amir
President
UNITEN Islamic Studies Society (PPI)
Sumber: Tranungkite.net
http://www.tranungkite.net/v7/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=12019
Nafikan Penglibatan, Najib Berbohong!
Kenyataan Media
Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia
2 Julai 2008
Nafikan Penglibatan, Najib Berbohong!
Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia (AMK) melihat penafian yang dibuat oleh Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Najib Tun Razak adalah merupakan satu pembohongan di sebalik penafian yang sangat dangkal dan langsung tidak mencerminkan wujud kesahihan di sebalik kenyataan beliau.
Pembohongan beliau bahawa beliau tidak terlibat di dalam laporan songsang yang dibuat oleh Saiful Bukhari Azlan tergambar jelas melalui fakta-fakta di sebalik kenyataan bercelaru yang dibuat Najib semalam.
Kenyataan Najib bahawa kehadiran Saiful bertemu Pegawai Khasnya pada 12 Februari lepas ‘untuk mendapatkan sokongan permohonan biasiswa kerajaan untuk melanjutkan pelajaran’ juga menimbulkan pertikaian besar. Bagaimanakah seorang bekas mahasiswa yang menamatkan pengajian awal boleh memohon biasiswa?
Dalam keadaan pertemuan tersebut dibuat sehari sebelum pembubaran Parlimen (13 Februari 2008), dan Saiful juga mula bertugas sewaktu kempen Pilihanraya Umum Ke-12 bermula, apakah ’sekadar satu kebetulan’ pertemuan tersebut berlaku di Pejabat Timbalan Perdana Menteri?
Apakah wujud elemen rasuah di sebalik ‘ganjaran biasiswa’ yang ditawarkan oleh Pejabat Timbalan Perdana Menteri ke atas Saiful sehingga sanggup melacurkan maruah diri untuk membuat laporan songsang sebagaimana yang didakwa?
AMK mencabar Najib untuk menafikan bahawa wujud satu pertemuan sulit yang melibatkan beliau dan Saiful dengan disertai oleh beberapa orang lain beberapa hari sebelum laporan polis dibuat oleh Saiful pada 28 Jun 2008.
AMK percaya bahawa wujud kerjasama terancang yang melibatkan Najib dan kuncu-kuncunya dalam konspirasi ini, bertujuan untuk mengelakkan pendedahan gempar Raja Petra Kamaruddin melalui Perakuan Sumpah beliau mengenai pembunuhan Altantuya Shaaribuu.
AMK secara terbuka juga membuat tawaran kepada mana-mana pegawai Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) dan Jabatan Peguam Negara yang berjiwa besar untuk tampil ke hadapan memberikan informasi-informasi berkaitan dengan komplot konspirasi terancang yang melibatkan Najib, Musa Hassan dan Abdul Gani Patail untuk merencana laporan songsang ini yang bertujuan untuk mewujudkan provokasi yang boleh memberikan keuntungan politik kepada Umno-BN.
Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin
Ketua
Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia
Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia
2 Julai 2008
Nafikan Penglibatan, Najib Berbohong!
Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia (AMK) melihat penafian yang dibuat oleh Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Najib Tun Razak adalah merupakan satu pembohongan di sebalik penafian yang sangat dangkal dan langsung tidak mencerminkan wujud kesahihan di sebalik kenyataan beliau.
Pembohongan beliau bahawa beliau tidak terlibat di dalam laporan songsang yang dibuat oleh Saiful Bukhari Azlan tergambar jelas melalui fakta-fakta di sebalik kenyataan bercelaru yang dibuat Najib semalam.
Kenyataan Najib bahawa kehadiran Saiful bertemu Pegawai Khasnya pada 12 Februari lepas ‘untuk mendapatkan sokongan permohonan biasiswa kerajaan untuk melanjutkan pelajaran’ juga menimbulkan pertikaian besar. Bagaimanakah seorang bekas mahasiswa yang menamatkan pengajian awal boleh memohon biasiswa?
Dalam keadaan pertemuan tersebut dibuat sehari sebelum pembubaran Parlimen (13 Februari 2008), dan Saiful juga mula bertugas sewaktu kempen Pilihanraya Umum Ke-12 bermula, apakah ’sekadar satu kebetulan’ pertemuan tersebut berlaku di Pejabat Timbalan Perdana Menteri?
Apakah wujud elemen rasuah di sebalik ‘ganjaran biasiswa’ yang ditawarkan oleh Pejabat Timbalan Perdana Menteri ke atas Saiful sehingga sanggup melacurkan maruah diri untuk membuat laporan songsang sebagaimana yang didakwa?
AMK mencabar Najib untuk menafikan bahawa wujud satu pertemuan sulit yang melibatkan beliau dan Saiful dengan disertai oleh beberapa orang lain beberapa hari sebelum laporan polis dibuat oleh Saiful pada 28 Jun 2008.
AMK percaya bahawa wujud kerjasama terancang yang melibatkan Najib dan kuncu-kuncunya dalam konspirasi ini, bertujuan untuk mengelakkan pendedahan gempar Raja Petra Kamaruddin melalui Perakuan Sumpah beliau mengenai pembunuhan Altantuya Shaaribuu.
AMK secara terbuka juga membuat tawaran kepada mana-mana pegawai Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) dan Jabatan Peguam Negara yang berjiwa besar untuk tampil ke hadapan memberikan informasi-informasi berkaitan dengan komplot konspirasi terancang yang melibatkan Najib, Musa Hassan dan Abdul Gani Patail untuk merencana laporan songsang ini yang bertujuan untuk mewujudkan provokasi yang boleh memberikan keuntungan politik kepada Umno-BN.
Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin
Ketua
Angkatan Muda Keadilan Malaysia
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Cerita-cerita Demo 28 Jun Lepas Di Dataran Pahlawan
Demo 28 Jun yang lepas di Dataran Pahlawan telah diadakan dengan jayanya. Sambutan yang diterima amat memberansangkan. Pihak Keselematan juga telah memberi kerjasama yang baik.Terima kasih Sdri Nahzatul Shima kerana sumbangan yang telah diberikan. Ikuti coretan Sdri Nahzatul Shima:
Seperti yang telah kuhebohkan sblom ni, satu demo telah diadakan di Dataran Pahlawan Banda Hilir Melaka pada Sabtu lepas. Dari hari Ahad lagi mailbox aku dah penuh minta upload gambau demo Sabtu lepas dalam blog. Tapi tak sempat beb. Malam tu kenon nk ada ceramah kat Jasin. Bila ceramah cancel, gempau pasal DSAI pulak masa on the way balik dari Jasin tu. Kelang kabut Malaya beb.
Demo start lebih kurang kul 3.15pm. Aku sampai lebih kurang kul 2.00. Saja la nk memantau. Parking kt MP. Masa tu polis dah banyak terpacak kat tepi jalan. Ada paling kurang 3 ke 4 trak. Standard la tu. Hari tu kat Jasin pon camtu jugak. Polis jer dah ader 100 orang. Aku sesorang kat depan pintu Melaka Megamall tu, tengok tak der sorang pon yang aku kenal. Rupanyer ramai hardcore dah belonggok kat McD.
Dari McD, diorang bergerak ke main entrance Melaka Megamall Masa ni, pak polisi dah mula menyerbu ke arah "Tok Ketua" kami.
Sementara depa dok leka sembang ngan polis, aku kabaukan dua tiga orang sebelah aku ni "aper lagi, bentang ler banner...jgn pedulikkan polis tu"..Bila dah banner terbentang, spanduk dah naik, Farhan mula main peranan. Macam tukang karut dalam dikir barat tu (bukan tukang carut)... Aku tak perasan aper yang dia laungkan mula mula..tapi bila dah ada kepala yang start, masa tu baru datang semangat. Bergema suara satu pekan.
TURUN TURUN...TURUN MINYAK!! TURUN TURUN..TURUN BN...HANCUR HANCUR..HANCUR BN.!! HIDUP HIDUP..HIDUP RAKYAT!!
Tak lama lepas tu, jalan depan Melaka Megamall tu ditutup. Nampaknya, tak sampai la masej pada pemandu kat Banda Hilir petang tu. Tapi ramai jugak duduk kat pulau jalan antara MP dan Dataran Pahlawan yg memerhati dari situ. Turut memerhati, pengunjung Melaka Megamall yang tengok dari dalam (belakang pintu kaca). Dari atas padang pun ramai jugak. Kalau ikut laporan paper hari Ahad tu, ada lebih kurang 500 orang yg terlibat.
Dalam keadaan tak diberi guna pembesar sora tu, sempat la 4 lima orang hardcore bercakap. Ada jugak wakil dari PAS. Dalam setengah jam ada la kot... Then kitorang bergerak keluar dari Megamall tu. Ingat nak berarak ke Taming Sari, tapi kena kena block dengan polis berhampiran McD. Untuk mengelakkan kekecohan, kami pon bersurai la kat situ.
Aku tak amik part pegang banner. Aku edar flyers. Sampai polis baju pink yang misai melintang tu pon aku bagi. Pandang aku macam nak telan. Aku pedulik aper. Edar risalah...bukan edar dadah.
Aper pun trima kasih pada yang join, sudi luang masa untuk demo tu. Dengar kabar, ramai yang silap dapat info, berkumpul kat tempat lain (atas padang Dataran). Kesian diorang, tak dapat join. Ada geng yang turun dari K.L tp sampai selepas kitorang bersurai.
Timer kasih pada polis polis yg bertugas masa tu (kecuali yg baju pink). Masa nak bersurai tu, sempat sorang polis tu datang kat aku sempat aku cakap,
"Timer kasih encik. Kami bukan nak buat kacau pon".
Polis tu dengan sora yg slow and steady,
"Tak per, kami pun bukannya aper...dah arahan..kami turun bertugas jer. Tak ada aper aper la. Tak payah risau. Kita pon tak suka minyak naik. Saya kalau pergi dengar ceramah bawak anak bini. Tapi saya pakai helmet".
Haaa....tengok tu, polis pon geng... Aku kata, tak per la tak boleh join macam ni, tapi sokongan tu mesti berterusan yer.... Polis tu pon jawab...Ooooo, itu musti...
Sumber: Nahzatul-Shima Blog
http://nazhatul-shima.blogspot.com/
Upko Slams Melaka CM
Kota Kinabalu: Upko Saturday criticised Umno Vice President and Melaka Chief Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Ali Rustam's support for the demonstration staged in Tawau against SAPP MP Datuk Chua Soon Bui.
Its Deputy President Datuk Wilfred Bumburing questioned whether certain people had the privilege to demonstrate while others, for example like the Hindraf (Hindu Rights Action Force), cannot.
"Ali Rustam's comment that he supported the demonstration in Tawau has set a precedent. Is he saying that in future if YBs defer in opinions, they are free to demonstrate?" he asked.
Bumburing, who is also Tuaran Member of Parliament, said Ali Rustam's comment will give the licence to other BN component parties to demonstrate should they differ in opinions.
"We respect the opinions of those who demonstrate but it seems that double standards are being practised whereby some demonstrations like those held by Hindraf and Bersih are stopped by the police while others are allowed," he said.
Bumburing said he understands the feelings of Umno but demonstrations should not be held for whatever reasons.
"For a senior leader like Ali Rustam to give his endorsement for a demo is unbecoming. He should not condone demonstrations and the Government should not be seen as having two sets of rules, that is, you can demonstrate if it is in our favour and can't if you are not," he said.
Bumburing was responding to Ali Rustam's comment and support for last Tuesday's demonstration staged by Umno members against SAPP in front of Chua's office.
The demonstration came about following SAPP's plan to support a no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who is also BN Chairman.
Sumber: DAILY EXPRESS NEWS
http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=58465
Its Deputy President Datuk Wilfred Bumburing questioned whether certain people had the privilege to demonstrate while others, for example like the Hindraf (Hindu Rights Action Force), cannot.
"Ali Rustam's comment that he supported the demonstration in Tawau has set a precedent. Is he saying that in future if YBs defer in opinions, they are free to demonstrate?" he asked.
Bumburing, who is also Tuaran Member of Parliament, said Ali Rustam's comment will give the licence to other BN component parties to demonstrate should they differ in opinions.
"We respect the opinions of those who demonstrate but it seems that double standards are being practised whereby some demonstrations like those held by Hindraf and Bersih are stopped by the police while others are allowed," he said.
Bumburing said he understands the feelings of Umno but demonstrations should not be held for whatever reasons.
"For a senior leader like Ali Rustam to give his endorsement for a demo is unbecoming. He should not condone demonstrations and the Government should not be seen as having two sets of rules, that is, you can demonstrate if it is in our favour and can't if you are not," he said.
Bumburing was responding to Ali Rustam's comment and support for last Tuesday's demonstration staged by Umno members against SAPP in front of Chua's office.
The demonstration came about following SAPP's plan to support a no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who is also BN Chairman.
Sumber: DAILY EXPRESS NEWS
http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=58465
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
US Cautions Over Sex Charges Against Malaysian Opposition Leader
The United States said Monday it would oppose any politically motivated investigation or prosecution of Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim facing fresh sex misconduct charges.
Anwar is being investigated over new allegations of sodomy, Malaysian police said Saturday, the same charge that saw him jailed six years until 2004, when the charge was overturned.
The former deputy premier accused the government of concocting the new sex claims by a 23-year-old male aide and had briefly sought sanctuary at the Turkish embassy in Kuala Lumpur on Sunday, saying he had received threats and feared for his life.
"The main point for us is that the rule of law needs to stand above politics," said Tom Casey, spokesman for the US State Department.
"And we would certainly oppose any use of law enforcement or judicial procedures for anything other than legitimate purposes of the law," he said.
Noting that Anwar had previously faced similar charges and that his conviction was ultimately overturned, Casey said, "So, we would hope that there's not a pattern here.
"But, certainly, we would be concerned that anything that is done be done in a way that is appropriate, that is a legitimate investigation of charges that might exist under Malaysian law, and would not be anything that was a politically motivated investigation or prosecution," he said.
The new charges erupted after Anwar stormed back into Malaysian politics in March general elections that handed the opposition a third of parliamentary seats and five states.
Since then, Anwar has said he is poised to form a new government with the help of defectors from the ruling coalition, undermining Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who has faced repeated demands to step down over the polls debacle.
The charismatic opposition leader said the new charges would be "a repeat of the 1998 fiasco" when he was hit with the sodomy and corruption counts that were widely seen as politically motivated.
Anwar said he was targeted again because he had evidence that the police and attorney-general had fabricated evidence in the original sex trial.
Premier Abdullah denied any involvement in the new charges.
"We had no plans to do anything to him just because he says he's made a political comeback," he said.
Malaysian Criminal Investigation Department chief Bakri Zinin said Anwar's aide had personally written the report against his boss detailing an incident at a condominium in an upmarket Kuala Lumpur suburb.
Sumber: MSN News
http://news.my.msn.com/regional/article.aspx?cp-documentid=1535493
Cubaan Bunuh DSAI
Assalamua'laikum to all,
Kami menerima maklumat daripada beberapa sumber termasuk dari Unit Perisikan sebuah negara jiran yang memaklumkan kepada kami ada cubaan untuk membunuh DSAI di mana beberapa orang pembunuh upahan (hired killer) telah dibawa masuk baru-baru ini.
Perlu saya ingatkan bahawa cubaan untuk membunuh DSAI telah berlaku sejak awal 1990an lagi:
Jadi berdasarkan rentetan cubaan membunuh ini, kami berpendapat maklumat yang kami terima berkenaan cubaan terbaru ini tidak bolej dipandang ringan. Atas sebab itulah kami membuat keputusan menasihatkan DSAI menerima tawaran Kedutaan Turki untuk melindungi DSAI. Kami berharap rakyat bertenang namun sentiasa mengikuti perkembangan mutakhir dan mendapatkan maklumat dari sumber-sumber yang sahih.
Adios
Zulkifli Noordin
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device via Vodafone-Celcom Mobile.
Sumber: Zulkifli Noordin Blog
http://zul4kulim.blogspot.com/
Kami menerima maklumat daripada beberapa sumber termasuk dari Unit Perisikan sebuah negara jiran yang memaklumkan kepada kami ada cubaan untuk membunuh DSAI di mana beberapa orang pembunuh upahan (hired killer) telah dibawa masuk baru-baru ini.
Perlu saya ingatkan bahawa cubaan untuk membunuh DSAI telah berlaku sejak awal 1990an lagi:
- Helikopter Nuri yang membawa DSAI semasa beliau TPM jatuh terhempas selepas menghantar beliau ke Pulau Pinang penghujong tahun 1990an. Tidak lama selepas itu berlaku peristiwa pemecatan DSAI. Helikopter tersebut disyaki telah disabotaj;
- Sistem brake kenderaan rasmi DSAI telah disabotaj menyebabkan ia hampir meragut nyawa DSAI apabila kenderaan tersebut menuruni bukit di Langkawi semasa lawatan rasmi DSAI sebagai TPM. Kecekapan pemandu kenderaan tersebut menyelamatkan DSAI. Perkara yang hampir sama berlaku kepada peguam utama DSAI Allahyarham Aris Chris Fernando bila sistem brake kereta Jaguarnya disabotaj hingga beliau hampir kemalangan serius di lebuhraya KL-Seremban semasa kes DSAI sedang berjalan;
- Helikopter yang sepatutnya membawa DSAI telah disabotaj menyebabkan rakan beliau Tan Sri Yahya Ahmad terkorban apabila helikopter tersebut jatuh terhempas. Asalnya DSAI dijadualkan menaiki heli tersebut keesokan paginya tetapi TS Yahya menggunakannya malam itu untuk menziarahi ibunya yang sakit;
- Cubaan membunuh DSAI semasa penangkapannya tahun 1998 bilamana unit UTK Polis menyerbu masuk rumah DSAI dengan senjata lengkap pada 20 Sept 1998. Namun usaha itu gagal kerana UTK mendapati terlalu ramai orang awam dirumah DSAI semasa itu;
- Cubaan membunuh DSAI semasa dalam tahanan di Penjara Sg. Buloh melalui racun arsenik. Cubaan ini disahkan oleh Polis Australia yang menyiasat racun tersebut di Makmal Polis Melbourne;
Jadi berdasarkan rentetan cubaan membunuh ini, kami berpendapat maklumat yang kami terima berkenaan cubaan terbaru ini tidak bolej dipandang ringan. Atas sebab itulah kami membuat keputusan menasihatkan DSAI menerima tawaran Kedutaan Turki untuk melindungi DSAI. Kami berharap rakyat bertenang namun sentiasa mengikuti perkembangan mutakhir dan mendapatkan maklumat dari sumber-sumber yang sahih.
Adios
Zulkifli Noordin
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device via Vodafone-Celcom Mobile.
Sumber: Zulkifli Noordin Blog
http://zul4kulim.blogspot.com/
Anwar keluar dari kedutaan Turki
kemaskini 11:10pm Ketua umum PKR Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim beredar dari rumah rasmi duta Turki di Kuala Lumpur, tempat beliau berlindung sejak pagi semalam, dan dipercayai menuju ke rumahnya.
Anwar berjalan keluar dari rumah Barlas Ozener, yang terletak tidak jauh dari bangunan kedutaan, dan memasuki kereta hitam kira-kira jam 6.45 petang ini.
Bekas timbalan perdana menteri itu kemudian bercakap ringkas kepada kumpulan kira-kira 50 wartawan di luar pagar rumah rasmi tersebut (foto).
Beliau berkata jaminan keselamatan yang diberikan kepadanya oleh timbalan perdana menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak, menteri menteri dalam negeri Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar dan menteri luar Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim mendorong beliau meninggalkan rumah duta berkenaan.
"Sekarang saya ambil keputusan keluar (dari kedutaan) kerana saya diberikan jaminan. Saya akan (lihat) apa yang akan berlaku," katanya. Anwar menambah, dakwaan liwat terhadapnya susulan rancangannya untuk mengumumkan akan bertanding pilihanraya kecil, minggu ini.
"Kita hampir menang. Minggu ini saya sepatutnya mengumumkan keputusan saya untuk bertanding dalam pilihanraya kecil," katanya dari celah bumbung kereta.Katanya, beliau juga akan mengumumkan penyertaan empat ahli parlimen komponen BN, termasuk dua dari Umno, bersama pembangkang minggu ini.
Beliau terus mengulangi keraguannya terhadap ketua polis negara dan peguam negara seperti kenyataan awalnya semalam.
"Yang saya bimbang ini adalah kepimpinan polis yang saya pertikaikan kerana saya ada bukti betapa Tan Sri Musa Hassan dan (Tan Sri Abdul) Gani Patail terlibat dalam perencanaan jahat, merekayasa atau memberikan fakta palsu dalam kes-kes (perbicaraan saya) terdahulu," tambahnya.
"Saya tentu akan memberikan kerjasama dalam kes penyiasatan. Tetapi penyiasatan apa?
"Penyiasatan yang berniat jahat, merekayasa cerita dan fakta seperti mana pernah berlaku dulu, bagaimana hakim, bagaimana polis yang menyiasat, bagaimana pendakwaraya dan Jabatan Peguam Negara dan peguam negara - ini masalahnya."
Sebelum itu peguamnya Sankara Nair tiba di kedutaan tersebut jam 6.15 petang.
Manakala isterinya Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, yang juga presiden PKR tiba kira-kira jam 6.40 tadi dan naib presidennya Azmin Ali sampai lima minit sebelumnya.
Bercakap ringkas kepada media, Azmin berkata pihaknya berpuas hati dengan jaminan keselamatan kerajaan.Malaysiakini difahamkan beliau pulang ke rumahnya di Bukit Segambut sebelum mengadakan sidang akhbar jam 9 malam di ibu pejabat PKR di Tropicana, Petaling Jaya.
Sementara itu, penyokong Anwar juga diminta berkumpul di tempat yang sama malam ini untuk mendengar amanat pemimpin tersebut.Kira-kira 250 penyokong Anwar dan wartawan menunggu-nunggu sidang media. Bagaimanapun menurut timbalan presiden PKR Dr Syed Husin Ali, ia telah dibatalkan.
Para penyokong Anwar yang mengharapkan maklumat daripada mulutnya sendiri perlahan-lahan beredar dari depan pejabat itu dengan berat hati. Risalah sehelai yang memuatkan berita terkini Malaysiakini dan Malaysia Today tentang perkembangan kes Anwar diedarkan sehingga para penyokong berebut-rebut mendapatkannya.
Teriakan "reformasi" dan takbir kedengaran selepas pengumuman pembatalan itu bagi kali kedua oleh timbalan setiausaha agung Johnson Chong menjelang 10 malam.
Menurutnya, jika ada sidang media, ia akan dimaklumkan esok.
Bagaimanapun lebih kurang 150 penyokong masih enggan beredar sehinggalah pengumuman rasmi dibuat oleh ibu pejabat parti melalui corong pembesar suara.
Anwar dimaklumkan sedang berbincang dengan kumpulan peguamnya malam ini di suatu tempat yang tidak dinyatakan.
Sumber: Malaysiakini
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
